Southern Pac. Co. v. Goldfield Consol. Milling & Transportation Co.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Second Division of the Northern District of California; Wm. C. Van Fleet, Judge. Action at law by the Goldfield Consolidated Milling & Transportation Company against the Southern Pacific Company and the Tonopah & Goldfield Railroad Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendants bring error.
1Opinion of the Court
ROSS, Circuit Judge.
The defendant in error on the 9th day of August, 1912, filed with the Interstate Commerce Commission a complaint against the Chicago & Erie Railroad Company et al., alleging that it had been charged an unreasonable rate for the transportation o£ a car load of steel window sash from Youngstown, Ohio, to Goldfield, Nev., and asking reparation; it being alleged in the complaint that the rate of $3.44 per 100 pounds, published and charged by the carriers for transporting that commodity between the points mentioned, was unreasonable, and praying that an order be entered by the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Pennsylvania Railroad v. International Coal Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Lehigh Valley R. v. ClarkCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1913
3Cited by15 opinions
- Roberto Hernandez, Inc. v. SchiffahrtsgesellschaftCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1941
- New York, N. H. & H. R. v. Ballou & WrightCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1917
- Atwood v. DaysDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2020
- Ayarzagoitia v. TahirDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2024
- Bosworth v. Centurion LLCDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2021
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.