De Ramus v. Mengel Co.
District Court, W.D. Kentucky
1Opinion of the Court
SHELBOURNE, District Judge.
This cause was tried by the Court, without the intervention of a jury. The Court, having considered the pleadings, stipulation of facts, exhibits and proof, makes the following:
Findings of Fact
1. Complainants are, and at all times since April 26, 1944, have been the duly appointed, qualified and acting trustees for the Chicago, Indianapolis and Louisville Railway Company, in reorganization proceedings, and were at all times involved in this action, operating the said railroad line as an interstate common carrier of persons and property by railroad for hire.
2.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. Gulf Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Union Wire Rope Corporation v. Atchison, T. & SF Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1933
- Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. Atlantic Bridge Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1932
- American Ry. Express Co. v. Price Bros.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1931
- Burrus Mill & Elevator Co. of Oklahoma v. Chicago, R. I. & P. R.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1942
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- West Coast Products Corporation v. Southern Pacific Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955
- Great Northern Railway Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967