Legal Opinion

United States Freight Company and Subsidiaries v. The United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided February 20, 1970No. 138-66Published

1Opinion of the Court

422 F.2d 887

UNITED STATES FREIGHT COMPANY and Subsidiaries

v.

The UNITED STATES.

No. 138-66.

United States Court of Claims.

February 20, 1970.

Walter D. Haynes, Washington, D. C., attorney of record, for plaintiff. J. Marvin Haynes, Haynes & Miller, N. Barr Miller, Joseph H. Sheppard, Jerome D. Meeker, and Robert S. Bersch, Washington, D. C., of counsel.

Joseph Kovner, Washington, D. C., with whom was Asst. Atty. Gen. Johnnie M. Walters, for defendant. Philip R. Miller and Ira M. Langer, Washington, D. C., of counsel.

Before COWEN, Chief Judge, and LARAMORE, DURFEE, DAVIS, COLLINS, SKELTON, and…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. José FerrerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
  2. Dynamics Corporation of America, as Successor in Interest to International Fermont, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968
  3. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Golonsky. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. GoldCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1952
  4. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. RayCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1954
  5. Bisbee-Baldwin Corporation v. Laurie E. Tomlinson, District Director of Internal Revenue for the District of FloridaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API