Legal Opinion · Dissent

In Re Honorable Davis

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided October 1, 1997No. 27757Published

1DissentSpringer, J.

I dissent from this court’s order affirming the removal of Judge Davis from his judicial office. Although I have several grounds for dissenting, I dissent principally because the Nevada Commission on Judicial Discipline has exceeded its constitutional jurisdiction in ordering removal. I am in complete agreement with Commissioner Griffin, who “disagree[d] that removal is warranted” and voted that, instead of being removed from office, Judge Davis should be “issued a censure, be required to attend courses in ethics and be fined.”

The several reasons for my dissent are as follows:

1.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gonzalez v. Commission on Judicial PerformanceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Whitehead v. Nevada Commission on Judicial DisciplineNevada Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Whitehead v. Nevada Com'n on Judicial DisciplineNevada Supreme Court · 1995
  4. State v. Second Judicial District Court of the State of NevadaNevada Supreme Court · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API