Legal Opinion

Rangel v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 18, 1988No. 88-167PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

The state concedes, and we agree, that the trial court erred in imposing a sentence in excess of the guidelines without providing written reasons. State v. Jackson, 478 So.2d 1054 (Fla.1985); e.g., Foster v. State, 491 So.2d 328 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986). We therefore vacate the sentence and remand for resentencing within the guidelines. Dougfield v. State, 529 So.2d 823 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988). Contra Waldron v. State, 529 So.2d 772 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988) (en banc). See also Brumley v. State, 520 So.2d 275 (Fla.1988); Shull v. Dugger, 515 So.2d 748 (Fla.1987); Harris v. State, 520 So.2d 688 (Fla. 3d DCA…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. JacksonSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
  2. Shull v. DuggerSupreme Court of Florida · 1987
  3. Waldron v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
  4. Harris v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
  5. Brumley v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1988

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Pope v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1990
  2. Pope v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API