Legal Opinion

United States v. Ralph Emeron Taken Alive, II

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided August 17, 2001No. 00-3110PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRIGHT, Circuit Judge.

A jury convicted Ralph Emeron Taken Alive, II of violating 18 U.S .C. § 111, which makes it unlawful to assault, resist, or impede a federal officer engaged in his official duties. Thereafter, the district court sentenced him to a term of imprison ment. Taken Alive appeals his conviction, arguing that the district court abused its discretion in refusing to admit evidence of the federal police officer’s character under Fed.R.Evid. 404(a)(2) and 405. Evidence of the police officer’s character was crucial to Taken Alive’s self-defense case. The exclusion of that evidence…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wheeling Pittsburgh Steel Corp. v. Beelman River Terminals, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001
  2. United States v. Cecil Eugene Ballew, A/K/A Eugene BallewCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
  3. United States v. James H. BurksCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
  4. United States v. Ronald Keiser, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  5. Cummings v. MaloneCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. AdjutantMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2005
  2. United States v. James Allen GreggCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
  3. United States v. Denise Marie HendersonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
  4. United States v. SteeleCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
  5. United States v. BordeauxCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API