Legal Opinion

Richardson v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided December 15, 1925No. 1 Div. 639. [fn*]PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The affidavit as originally made, and upon which this defendant was tried in the county court, charged that defendant did buy, sell, or have in his possession, prohibited liquors, etc. On appeal to the circuit court from a conviction in the county court, the court, on motion of the solicitor, struck from the affidavit the word "buy." The defendant objected to the amendment, and objected to being put to trial upon the affidavit as amended. Under the statute, the affidavit may be amended to meet the ends of justice, and to prevent a dismissal of the case upon any informality, irregularity, or…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Nelson v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1916
  2. May v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1925

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Leick v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1958
  2. Lakey v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1952
  3. Richardson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
  4. Hulett v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Leick v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1958

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API