Legal Opinion

State v. Pickett

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided October 22, 1985No. C2-85-987PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION CRIPPEN, Judge.

Appellant challenges a sentence imposed upon resentencing following conviction for five acts of first degree criminal sexual conduct. The trial judge advised appellant that he intended to impose a sentence of 315 months, and appellant requested a sentencing hearing. See Minn.Stat. 244.10, subd. 1 (Supp.1983). Following the hearing, the court sentenced appellant to 331 months. We affirm, but modify the sentence to 315 months to comply with the trial court’s earlier statement.

FACTS

Appellant committed a series of rapes in the north Minneapolis suburbs. He pleaded guilty to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. State v. HernandezSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  3. State v. PickettSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  4. State v. PickettCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. YantCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  2. State v. PendzimasCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  3. State v. EllerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010
  4. State v. HattonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
  5. State v. JamesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API