Legal Opinion

Salducco v. Etkin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 27, 1935PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCrapser, J.

On September 24, 1934, a petition in due form was filed in the office of the clerk of the city of Schenectady, stating that the adoption of plan “ C ” of a charter under chapter 444 of the Laws of 1914, known as the Optional Oity Government Law would be presented to the electors of the city of Schenectady for a determination as provided in that statute-

The eity clerk of the city of Schenectady, in accordance with’ said law, presented .a certified copy of the petition to the commissioners of elections and the matter was voted on at an election held in the said city on the 6th day of November,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Mills v. . SweeneyNew York Court of Appeals · 1916

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Burke v. KernNew York Court of Appeals · 1941
  2. D'Addario v. McNabNew York Court of Appeals · 1973
  3. City of Buffalo v. LawleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1958
  4. Twin City Service Station, Inc. v. City of North TonawandaNew York Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Albert v. KernNew York Supreme Court · 1941

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API