Legal Opinion

Hall v. State

New York Court of General Session of the Peace

Decided April 22, 1926No. 6PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pennewill, C. J.,

delivering the opinion of the Court:

The record of the justice, which is before us, speaks for itself, and must be presumed to correctly state the proceedings at *235the trial. We think it is the general rule of law in those states that have a constitutional provision respecting former jeopardy, similar to ours (Article 1, Section 8, Constitution of 1897) that where a defendant is placed on trial under a valid indictment and a jury is drawn and sworn to try the case, he cannot be again tried for the same offense. 16 C. J. 236, 237, 248, 249; Commonwealth v. Hart, 149 Mass. 7, 20…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. PerezSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
  2. Alexander v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1884
  3. Commonwealth v. HartMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1889
  4. McFadden v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1853
  5. State v. ChampeauSupreme Court of Vermont · 1880

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Fanning v. Superior Court of the State of Delaware Ex Rel. New Castle CountySupreme Court of Delaware · 1974
  2. State v. ValentNew York Court of General Session of the Peace · 1926
  3. State v. SchwartzNew York Court of General Session of the Peace · 1932
  4. State v. BoylesNew York Court of General Session of the Peace · 1935
  5. Rentoul v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1973

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API