Hall v. State
New York Court of General Session of the Peace
1Opinion of the Court
Pennewill, C. J.,
delivering the opinion of the Court:
The record of the justice, which is before us, speaks for itself, and must be presumed to correctly state the proceedings at *235the trial. We think it is the general rule of law in those states that have a constitutional provision respecting former jeopardy, similar to ours (Article 1, Section 8, Constitution of 1897) that where a defendant is placed on trial under a valid indictment and a jury is drawn and sworn to try the case, he cannot be again tried for the same offense. 16 C. J. 236, 237, 248, 249; Commonwealth v. Hart, 149 Mass. 7, 20…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. PerezSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- Alexander v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1884
- Commonwealth v. HartMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1889
- McFadden v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1853
- State v. ChampeauSupreme Court of Vermont · 1880
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Fanning v. Superior Court of the State of Delaware Ex Rel. New Castle CountySupreme Court of Delaware · 1974
- State v. ValentNew York Court of General Session of the Peace · 1926
- State v. SchwartzNew York Court of General Session of the Peace · 1932
- State v. BoylesNew York Court of General Session of the Peace · 1935
- Rentoul v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1973
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.