Legal Opinion

Hubbard v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided March 28, 1928No. 11453PublishedCited by 8 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of violating the loan brokers law as defined in Arts. 1127 and 1129 of the Penal Code, and Arts. 6162 and 6163, R. C. S. (1925), punishment a fine of $150.

Appellant’s motion for new trial was overruled and court adjourned on June 4, 1927. The statement of facts and all of appellant’s bills of exception were not filed until September 6, 1927. As neither were timely filed, they are not entitled to consideration and are stricken upon motion of the state, Art. 760, C. C. P.; Miller v. State, 267 S. W. 487; Parker v. State, 200 S. W. 1083; Mireles v. State,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Mireles v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1924
  2. Miller v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1924
  3. Parker v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1917

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Kelleher v. MinshullWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Houston v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1941
  3. Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1929
  4. Harvill v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1945
  5. Franklin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1931

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API