Legal Opinion
Tacoma Promenade v. City of Tacoma
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 20, 2002No. 01-35143; D.C. No. CV-99-05546-FDBPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
*622MEMORANDUM*
Tacoma Promenade (“Promenade”) appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment for the City of Tacoma (“City”) on Promenade’s breach of contract claim. We have jurisdiction over this timely appeal. We affirm substantially for the reasons stated by the district court.
Promenade’s predecessor, Schurgin Development Companies (“SDC”), contracted with the City in October 1988 to purchase and develop about 80 acres of property, known as the Wapato Hills Property. A 1989 rezoning of the property would have permitted development of an apartment complex and a shopping center. The…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Berg v. HudesmanWashington Supreme Court · 1990
- Badgett v. Security State BankWashington Supreme Court · 1991
- Johnson v. BradoCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1990
- Montana Pole & Treating Plant and Torger L. Oaas v. I.F. Laucks and Company Monsanto Chemical Company, Reichhold Chemicals, Inc. Dow Chemical Company, Inc., Montana Pole & Treating Plant and Torger L. Oaas v. I.F. Laucks and Company Monsanto Chemical Company, Reichhold Chemicals, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
3Cited by1 opinion
- Burlington Insurance Co. v. Blind Squirrel, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 2017