Dunham v. Fox
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Craioford District Court. — Hon. Z. A. Church, Judge. Certiorari to the defendants, as members of the board of trustees of Boyer township in said county, to test the legality of the proceedings of the board in the consolidation of the roads of the township. Judgment for plaintiffs, and the defendants appealed.—
1Opinion of the Court
Granger, J:
I. The cause was submitted on an agreed statement of facts, from which it appears that the defendants are the trustees of Boyer township; that a petition was presented to the board to consolidate the road districts of the township into one highway district; that the names on the petition represented a majority of the voters of the township; that a remonstrance was also presented with the petition, on which were names appearing on the petition; that, deducting from the names on the petition those appearing on both the petition and the remonstrance, the remainder would not be a…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State ex rel. Lewis v. EgglestonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1886
- Slingerland v. NortonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
- Seibert v. LovellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1894
- Black v. CampbellIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
- State ex rel. Hawley v. County Board of SupervisorsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1894
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Miller v. City of Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1909
- Zilske v. AlbersSupreme Court of Iowa · 1947
- Green v. SmithSupreme Court of Iowa · 1900
- State ex rel. Ketterling v. GregorySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1910
- Salt Lake & Utah R. v. Payson CityUtah Supreme Court · 1926
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.