Legal Opinion

Wright v. McCampbell & Son

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 24, 1890No. 2727PublishedCited by 21 opinions

Appeal from Nueces. Tried below before Hon. J. B. Wells, Special District Judge. The opinion contains a statement.

1Opinion of the Court

HENRY, Associate Justice.

Appellees instituted this suit to recover from appellant the sum of $1217, charged to be due them for professional services rendered in a suit against appellant in the District Court of Neuces County by plaintiffs, “the firm of McCampbell & Givens, and by plaintiffs as the successors and assignees of said firm.’’

The petition charges that John S. McCampbell and E. A. McCampbell compose the law firm and partnership of McCampbell & Son, and that *646they are “the lawful successors and assigns of the law firm of McCamphell & Givens, doing business from 1879, and many years…

2Cited by21 opinions

  1. Clare Dodge Childers v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
  2. Clem Lumber Co. v. Elliott Lumber Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1923
  3. Cavers v. Sioux Oil & Refining Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1931
  4. Little v. CaldwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Peoples v. BrockmanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API