Legal Opinion
Evans v. Rogerson
District Court, S.D. Iowa
Decided December 15, 1999No. 4-98-CV-90369PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION, RULINGS, AND ORDER GRANTING WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS, AS AMENDED BY ORDER DATED DECEMBER 15,1999
PRATT, District Judge.
Petitioner, Jack Spencer Evans (“Evans”), brings this habeas corpus petition, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, challenging his custody after conviction for first degree murder. Evans’s petition is based on five claims: 1) Fifth Amendment constitutional violations in obtaining incriminating statements; 2) ineffective assistance of trial counsel; 3) ineffective assistance of appellate counsel; 4) newly discovered evidence; and 5) insufficiency of the evidence.…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Brecht v. AbrahamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Jack Spencer Evans v. Russell Rogerson, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000
- State v. O'NealMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013
- Jack Spencer Evans v. Russell RogersonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000