Legal Opinion
United States v. Leland Smart, Jr.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided November 15, 2010No. 09-2459UnpublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KAREN NELSON MOORE, Circuit Judge.
Defendant Leland Smart appeals the district court’s modification of his super vised release conditions to include a condition of electronic monitoring by a Global Positioning System (“GPS”) device for a period of six months. Smart argues that the district court abused its discretion in ordering the condition under the circumstances of his case. Because the six-month period for the GPS monitoring condition has ended, however, we DISMISS Smart’s appeal as moot.
I. BACKGROUND & PROCEDURE
In 1993, Smart pleaded guilty to violating the federal…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Nken v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Spencer v. KemnaSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Scripps-Howard Radio, Inc. v. Federal Communications CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Dion R. McPherson v. Michigan High School Athletic Association, Inc., Board of Education of the Public Schools of the City of Ann ArborCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
- Mario Rosales-Garcia v. J.T. Holland, Warden, Reynero Arteaga Carballo v. Mark Luttrell, Warden Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Ashley Bard v. Brown Cty., OhioCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020