Legal Opinion

First National Bank v. McKinley Coal Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 4, 1904No. Appeal, No. 129PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal, No. 129, Oct. T.,. 1904, by defendant, from decree of C. P. No. 1, Allegheny Co., Dec. T., 1902, No. 6, on bill in equity, in case of First National Bank of Pittsburg v. McKinley Coal Company, W. H. McKinley, Ernest H. McKinley et al.

Read the full summary

Appeal, No. 129, Oct. T.,. 1904, by defendant, from decree of C. P. No. 1, Allegheny Co., Dec. T., 1902, No. 6, on bill in equity, in case of First National Bank of Pittsburg v. McKinley Coal Company, W. H. McKinley, Ernest H. McKinley et al. Bill in equity for discovery, etc.' The bill substantially averred as follows : 1. The plaintiff is a national bank. 2. The first named defendant is a corporation under the laws of the state of West Virginia. 3. The other defendants are stockholders, and William H. McKinley the president, and Ernest H. McKinley the secretary and treasurer of the McKinley…

1Opinion of the Court

Per Ctjriam,

There is nothing in this case but disputed questions of fact, and the judgment is affirmed on the conclusions of the court below.

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Duncan v. DuncanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  2. Jones v. WeirSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1907
  3. O'Neill's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  4. Duncan v. DuncanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API