Kelch v. Mass Transit Administration
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the CourtDigges, J.
Presently before us is the question whether, in affirming the judgment entered in the Superior Court of Baltimore City in favor of the defendants in this motor vehicle negligence action, the Court of Special Appeals misapplied Maryland Rule 400 d pertaining to pretrial discovery? Rule 400 d, central to the resolution of this query, in full reads:
d. Trial Preparation Materials.
Subject to the provisions of sections e (Party’s or Witness’ Own Statement) and f (Information From Experts Who Are Expected to Testify at Trial) of this Rule, a party may not obtain discovery of documents and tangible…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Klein v. WeissCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
- Baltimore Transit Co. v. MezzanottiCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1961
- Kelch v. Mass Transit AdministrationCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1979
- Mason v. WolfingCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1972
- Williams v. MORAN, ETC.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1967
3Cited by40 opinions
- Fraidin v. WeitzmanCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1992
- Rodriguez v. ClarkeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
- Public Service Commission v. Patuxent Valley Conservation LeagueCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
- E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co. v. Forma-Pack, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
- Burke v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1985
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.