Legal Opinion

Penix v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 20, 1988No. 2-87-016-CRPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FARRIS, Justice.

On January 13, 1987, appellant pleaded guilty to the charge of forgery by passing a check, see TEX.PENAL CODE ANN. sec. 32.21 (Vernon 1974), and answered “true” to one of two enhancement paragraphs in the indictment. The trial court assessed punishment at fifteen years imprisonment.

We affirm.

Appellant’s sole point of error contends that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel because his lawyer was suspended from the practice of law at the time appellant pleaded guilty. Appellant urges that we take judicial notice of two documents appended to his brief. One…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Turner v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987
  2. Wilson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984
  3. Gonzales v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987
  4. Booth v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1973
  5. Young v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Moranza v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1996
  2. Khoi Trong Huynh v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1992
  3. Elwell v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1994
  4. Robinson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1990
  5. Abel v. Surgitek, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1998

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API