Legal Opinion
Walter Williams v. Walter E. Craven, Warden, California Adult Authority
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 30, 1972No. 71-1067PublishedCited by 53 opinions
1Per curiam
Williams, a California state prisoner, appeals from an order of the District Court denying his petition for habeas corpus relief. We affirm on the ground that Williams has failed to satisfy his burden of establishing that he has exhausted state remedies in respect to the issues presented to the District Court. See Schiers v. California, 333 F.2d 173 (9th Cir. 1964).
In his petition below, Williams claimed that in the course of parole revocation proceedings he was deprived of his constitutional rights to counsel, to confrontation and cross-examination of hostile witnesses, and to production of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States Ex Rel. John Bey v. Connecticut State Board of ParoleCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971
- Wallace Leroy Schiers v. The People of the State of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
- In Re TuckerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Robert Dorado, on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. Henry W. Kerr, Chairman, California Adult Authority, in His Official CapacityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
- Bearden v. South CarolinaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1971
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- Rollins v. Superior Court of Los AngelesDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2010
- Jesse Lee Griffin v. California Adult Authority, L. S. Nelson, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
- Sechrest v. IgnacioDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1996
- Trujillo v. StoneDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1974
- (HC) Hasan v. State of CaliforniaDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.