Legal Opinion
State v. Chandler
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided March 21, 1924No. 23,853PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Wilson, €. J.
The relator procured a writ of habeas corpus to issue in the district court and upon a hearing that court quashed the writ and remanded the relator to the custody of the respondent. The relator has appealed and the matter is here for trial de novo. Reference has been had and the record filed in this court.
*448Rice Brothers, commission merchants in Chicago, sent relator, then living in Dodge county, Minnesota, $2,000 with which to buy cattle for them and ship to them at Chicago. He bought cattle, but shipped them to South St. Paul and did not turn the proceeds over to Rice Brothers.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Alvarez v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1905
- Roerig v. HoughtonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
- Baker v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1894
- State ex rel. Brown v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
- State v. NugentSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. MeyerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
- State Ex Rel. Schwanke v. UtechtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
- State Ex Rel. Ahern v. YoungSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
- State Ex Rel. Halverson v. YoungSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. DiDio v. BaldiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.