Legal Opinion

Goldman v. Adlman

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided September 11, 1935PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C.J.

The plaintiff seeks by this suit in equity to enjoin the enforcement of a judgment and execution obtained by the defendant Adlman, hereafter called the defendant, against the plaintiff on the ground that the defendant’s claim is barred by the plaintiff’s discharge in bankruptcy. Badger v. Jordan Marsh Co. 256 Mass. 153. The defendant pleaded (1) res judicata and (2) lack of notice or knowledge of the plaintiff’s bankruptcy whereby that discharge was prevented from being operative as to his claim. At the trial all material facts well pleaded in the bill and answer were admitted to be true…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railroad v. Southern Express Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1883
  2. Swan v. Justices of Superior CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
  3. Sinclair v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  4. Vigeant v. Postal Telegraph Cable Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1927
  5. Franklin v. North Weymouth Cooperative BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Sandler v. SilkMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  2. Donnelly v. MontagueMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
  3. Clinton Petroleum Services, Inc. v. NorrisCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1974
  4. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Rodco AutobodyDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1996
  5. Murphy v. Charlie's Home Improvement Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1976

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API