Papke v. Board of Education

Although for the reasons stated in Matter of Jaffe v. Bd. of Education, City of N. Y. (240 App. Div. 402), decided herewith, I am of opinion that the appointment of temporary teachers is contrary to law, I concur in the affirmance of this order. Unlike Matter of Jaffe v. Bd. of Education, City of N. Y. (supra), the purpose of this proceeding is not to enjoin the practice against which complaint is made and to require appointments to the existing vacancies to be made in accordance with subdivisions 1, 3 and 5 of section 872 of the Education Law, but to require the board of education to…