Fortney v. Bell Telephone
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
HESTER, Judge:
This appeal comes to us from the lower court’s order sustaining appellees’ preliminary objections in the form of a demurrer to appellant’s complaint. For purpose of this appeal, we must accept as true the facts averred in appellant’s complaint and we accord him all the inferences reasonably deductible therefrom. Allstate Insurance Company v. Fioravanti, 451 Pa. 108, 299 A.2d 585 (1973); Barto v. Felix, 250 Pa.Super. 262, 378 A.2d 927 (1977); Stringert & Bowers, *578Inc. v. On-Line Systems, Inc., 236 Pa.Super. 196, 345 A.2d 194 (1975). So viewed, the well plead facts in the complaint…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- People v. RicciardiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Allstate Insurance v. FioravantiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Breinig v. Allegheny CountySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
- Iowa State Highway Commission v. SmithSupreme Court of Iowa · 1957
- Rolling Green Golf Club CaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Sienkiewicz v. PennDOT, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lackawanna County2003
- Fortney v. Bell TelephoneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981