Legal Opinion
Flint v. Gust
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided November 7, 1986No. 73392PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Banke, Chief Judge.
The appellant sued the appellees, a Wisconsin corporation and its president, to recover damages for fraud and conversion based on their alleged conduct of a “bait-and-switch” operation involving the sale of customized vans and trucks. Jurisdiction over the appellees, neither of whom are Georgia residents, was predicated on subsection (3) of our Long Arm Statute, OCGA § 9-10-91, which is applicable by its terms to tort actions arising from acts and omissions occurring outside the state which lead to injury inside the state. The appellant later amended his complaint to add a…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Coe & Payne Co. v. Wood-Mosaic Corp.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1973
- Shellenberger v. TannerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
- Davis Metals, Inc. v. AllenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1973
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Behar v. Aero Med International, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1988
- Aero Toy Store, LLC v. GrievesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
- Gust v. FlintSupreme Court of Georgia · 1987
- Electronic Transaction Network v. KatzDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1989
- ETS Payphone, Inc. v. TK INDUSTRIESCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.