Van Keuren v. McLaughlin
New Jersey Court of Chancery
This cause was argued upon final hearing on the amended bill, answers, and proofs.
1Opinion of the Court
The Chancellor.
This cause was argued between some of the parties, on its merits, and decided at the May term, 1868. The controversy then was between the complainants, who were judgment creditors of James McLaughlin, and Michael McLaughlin, the father of James, to whom he had conveyed his real estate, shortly before the entry of the judgment of the complainants. The matter in controversy was, whether these conveyances to Michael were fraudulent, and void, as against the complainants, who alleged that they were made to defraud and delay them, and without adequate consideration, or that they…
2Cited by1 opinion
- Hendershot v. HendershotNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1943