Legal Opinion

In re the Personal Restraint of Erhart

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 7, 2015No. 89107-9PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

¶1 Toby Erhart’s judgment and sentence on multiple counts of first degree child rape and incest became final on direct appeal in 2008. In 2010, Erhart filed a personal restraint petition challenging his convictions, arguing for the first time that his constitutional right to a public trial was violated. The Court of Appeals dismissed the petition as untimely. We grant discretionary review and affirm.

FACTS

¶2 During Erhart’s trial, the court interviewed several prospective jurors privately in chambers without first conducting the courtroom closure analysis required by State v. Bone-Club, 128…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Waller v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. State v. Bone-ClubWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  3. State v. Bone-ClubWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  4. In re the Personal Restraint of OrangeWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  5. State v. WiseWashington Supreme Court · 2012

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State of Washington v. Dallin David FortCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
  2. In re the Personal Restraint of MinesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
  3. State v. WallerWashington Supreme Court · 2021
  4. Personal Restraint Petition of John Edward Mines, Jr.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API