Legal Opinion · Dissent

Peterson v. Volkswagen of America, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided March 31, 2004No. 03-0955Published

1DissentSnyder, J.

¶ 18. (dissenting). The majority opinion reverses the order dismissing Peterson's complaint and concludes that she is a consumer under the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act. I respectfully dissent from the majority opinion conclusion "that Peterson is a category two consumer permitted under the Act to enforce Volkswagen's written warranty." That conclusion is premature and unfair to the trial court and to the parties. I would vacate the order and remand for further consideration of the motion to dismiss by the trial court and the parties.

¶ 19. Peterson is a lessee of the Volkswagen vehicle. The…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. In RE MARRIAGE OF COOK v. CookWisconsin Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Doe v. Archdiocese of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1997
  3. DiCintio v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 2002
  4. Jandrt Ex Rel. Brueggeman v. Jerome Foods, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Voelker v. Porsche Cars North America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API