Legal Opinion

Gammon v. Bull

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 24, 1892PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from Carroll District Court. — Hon. J. H. Macomber, Judge. Action in equity to recover the amount of certain promissory notes, and to foreclose certain chattel mortgages. From a decree giving him but a part of the relief demanded the plaintiff, appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, C. J.

Two of the four notes upon which this action was brought were given on the third, day of June, 1889, by the defendant, George H. Bull, to the defendant O. W. Carpenter, for the sum of one hundred and sixty-six dollars each, with interest thereon at ten per cent, per annum. One was payable on the first day of September, and the other on the first day of January, after their date, and both were secured by a chattel mortgage. The notes were assigned without recourse by Carpenter to the plaintiff, and the mortgage transferred, about the thirtieth day of August, 1889. The notes are unpaid,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Plano Manufacturing Co. v. GriffithSupreme Court of Iowa · 1888
  2. Clapp v. TrowbridgeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1888
  3. American Well Works v. WhinerySupreme Court of Iowa · 1888

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Woody v. WagnerWashington Supreme Court · 1916
  2. First National Bank of Corning v. ReidSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
  3. First National Bank of Oakdale v. BrashearCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Swayne v. TillotsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1910
  5. Third National Bank v. KniffenWashington Supreme Court · 1927

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API