Legal Opinion
Spalding v. Local Union No. 4714, Communication Workers
District Court, S.D. Indiana
Decided January 16, 1991No. IP 89-141-CPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
BARKER, District Judge.
Before the court are Defendants’ Local Union No. 4714, Communication Workers of America (“Local Union”); Communication Workers of America (“CWA”); and Indiana Bell Telephone Company, Inc. (“Indiana Bell”) motions for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56(e) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The issues are whether Plaintiff, Jerry Spalding (“Spald-ing”), filed his hybrid § 301/duty of fair representation claim within the 6 month statute of limitations period applicable to § 301 claims, DelCostello v. International Bhd. of Teamsters, 462 U.S. 151, 103 S.Ct. 2281, 76…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- DelCostello v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Milo John Munson v. Wendell R. Friske, John Rybak, Jr., Kenneth Todd, and Ashland CountyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
- Shirley Metz v. Tootsie Roll Industries, Inc., and Local Union No. 1, Bakery, Confectionery and Tobacco Workers' International Union of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
- Big O Tire Dealers, Inc. v. Big O Warehouse, an Illinois General Partnership, and Richard MacQueen Joseph Nuzzo, Alex Nuzzo and Paul ArraCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
- John Yorger v. Pittsburgh Corning CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Vance v. Lobdell-Emery Manufacturing Co.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 1996