Bell v. Bell

Per Curiam :

The respondent has moved the Court to have this cause reargued, chiefly because the testimony in the case was incorrectly, though unintentionally, typed by the appellant.

The appellant admits some errors in transcribing the testimony from the master’s notes, and some of them are material, but the manner of the commission of them was explained by appellant.

1 The fault lies equally with appellant and respondent; it was the business of both to see that a correct copy of the testimony was furnished the Court. And no excuse has been made therefor, except that which always follows…