Motor Carriers Labor Advisory Council v. Trucking Management, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
HUYETT, District Judge.
The defendant Funds and their Trustees 1 have filed a motion to strike plaintiffs’ jury demand.
The Fund defendants and their Trustees argue that the remaining claims in this case arise under section 502(a)(2), 29 U.S.C. § 1132(a)(2), and section 409(a), 29 U.S.C. § 1109(a), of the Employment Retirement Income Security Act [ERISA]. The defendants also contend that plaintiffs’ remaining claims in Counts VIII, IX and X are equitable in nature and, therefore, the individual employee plaintiffs are not entitled to a trial by jury. 2 In response, plaintiffs candidly…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Curtis v. LoetherSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- John H. Cox v. Keystone Carbon Company, Richard Reuscher and William ReuscherCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
- Pane v. RCA Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
- Nedd v. United Mine Workers Of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
- Turner v. CF & I Steel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Alexander v. Primerica Holdings, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1993
- Broadnax Mills, Inc. v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of VirginiaDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1995
- Alco Industries, Inc. v. Wachovia CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2007
- BERKELHAMMER v. ADP TOTALSOURCE GROUP, INC.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2024