Boose v. Henderson

On petition for rehearing it is contended that the chancellor applied erroneous principles of law in determining the value of rentals due by appellants to appellee and that we have departed from the provisions of the statute, Sec. 795 R.G.S., 1026 C.G.L., Sec. 3239 R.G.S., 5047 C.G.L. et seq., and from the rule established by our former decisions, especially in the case of Lovett v. Shore, et al., 111 Fla. 592, 139 So. 194, and in the opinion in former appeal in this case, Henderson v. Boose et ux., 142 Fla. 804, 196 So. 671.

We cannot agree with this contention. Our opinion is not in conflict…