Legal Opinion

Elstun v. Elstun

Nebraska Court of Appeals

Decided February 2, 1999No. A-97-892PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Inbody, Judge.

Denise D. Elstun appeals from the district court’s refusal to expand the scope of a protection order she had obtained against her husband, Michael D. Elstun (Mike). Mike cross-appeals, arguing that there was insufficient evidence to issue the protection order, that he was denied procedural due process, and that he was denied his right to court-appointed counsel. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm.

I. STATEMENT OF FACTS

On June 23, 1997, Denise, acting pro se, applied for a protection order against Mike, pursuant to Neb. Rev. Stat. § 42-924 (Reissue 1993), by filling out a…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Lassiter v. Department of Social Servs. of Durham Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Lease Lights, Inc. v. Public Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. State Ex Rel. Grape v. ZachNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
  5. State Ex Rel. Shepherd v. Nebraska Equal Opportunity CommissionNebraska Supreme Court · 1997

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Elstun v. ElstunNebraska Supreme Court · 1999
  2. State v. BeecherSupreme Court of Iowa · 2000
  3. State on Behalf of State of Florida v. Julio G.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2019
  4. State on behalf of Mia G. v. Julio G.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API