Legal Opinion

Hooper v. Denney

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided March 20, 1992No. 2900666PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROBERTSON, Presiding Judge.

This is the second time this case has been before this court. On July 5, 1991, this *1389court reversed and remanded this case to the trial court because the trial court erred in entering an award of compensation without first making a finding as to the employee’s loss of ability to earn. Hooper v. Denney, 587 So.2d 340 (Ala.Civ.App.1991).

On remand, the trial court entered the following order:

“This Court’s Final Order of December 12, 1990, is hereby amended, supplemented and corrected (so as to comply with the directions of the Court of Civil Appeals, in its review of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lankford v. INTERN. PAPER CO.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1984
  2. Marley Erectors, Inc. v. RiceCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1990
  3. Gibson v. Southern Stone Company Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1986
  4. Tyson Foods, Inc. v. CallowayCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1990
  5. Hooper v. DenneyCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1991

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bentley Pontiac/Cadillac, Inc. v. AdamsCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1994
  2. Webb Oil Company, Inc. v. HolmesCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API