Legal Opinion

New v. Atlantic Greyhound Corp.

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided September 3, 1947No. Record No. 3224PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpratley, J.

Mrs. Ethel New, a colored woman, instituted this proceeding by notice of motion to recover damages for wrongs and personal injuries, which she alleged were occasioned by reason of an assault and battery committed by the Atlantic Greyhound Corporation- and W. N. Smith, in forcibly evicting her from a passenger motor vehicle of the defendant corporation, a common carrier, upon her refusal to occupy a seat assigned to her by the driver of the vehicle. The defendants pleaded not guilty.

The case was tried before a jury, which rendered a verdict in favor of the defendants. A motion for a new trial…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Plessy v. FergusonSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. Dahnke-Walker Milling Co. v. BondurantSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  3. In Re RahrerSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  4. Hall v. DeCuirSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  5. McCullough v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1898

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. King v. County of ArlingtonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1954
  2. Fallon Florist, Inc. v. City of RoanokeSupreme Court of Virginia · 1950
  3. Commonwealth v. Carolina Coach Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1951
  4. APARTMENT & OB ASS'N OF MET. WASH. v. WashingtonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1975
  5. Almond v. DaySupreme Court of Virginia · 1957

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API