In Re Marriage of Stanley
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice McCULLOUGH
The respondent, Steve K. Hoener (Steve), appeals various aspects of an order concerning maintenance, child support, attorney fees, and owelty entered subsequent to an order dissolving his marriage to the petitioner, Dawn S. Hoener (Dawn).
Following the dissolution of the parties’ marriage on June 4, 1981, the court entered a series of orders pertaining to property disposition, child support and custody, and maintenance, as well as attorney fees, marital debts and owelty.
In order to place this case in proper perspective, it is necessary to view in part the actions and orders of the trial court…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Adler v. AdlerIllinois Supreme Court · 1940
- Craig v. CraigIllinois Supreme Court · 1896
- Stillman v. StillmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1881
- S. v. GMissouri Court of Appeals · 1957
- In Re Marriage of JacobsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- In Re Marriage of Nettleton and TerrellAppellate Court of Illinois · 2004
- In re Marriage of HawkingAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992
- In Re Marriage of GrayAppellate Court of Illinois · 2000
- In re Marriage of FrascoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1994
- In Re Marriage of FrascoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1994
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.