Legal Opinion

Perkins v. Department of Revenue

Oregon Tax Court

Decided September 19, 2001No. TC 4526PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CARL N. BYERS, Senior Judge.

Plaintiffs (taxpayers) appeal a magistrate decision upholding the action of the Multnomah County Assessor. The assessor issued a “corrected” tax statement, retroactively denying a property tax exemption for the 1999-2000 tax year. Intervenor-Defendant Multnomah County (the county) intervened to defend the assessor’s actions. The parties have stipulated the facts and submitted the matter to the court on cross-motions for summary judgment.

FACTS

Although the parties stipulated to some facts, not all the necessary facts have been stipulated. However, it appears there is…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Emanuel Lutheran Charity Board v. Department of RevenueOregon Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Willamette University v. State Tax CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Freightliner Corp. v. Department of RevenueOregon Tax Court · 1973
  5. Freightliner Corp. v. Department of RevenueOregon Supreme Court · 1976

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Boring Dmcs. Gr. v. Clackamas Cty. Assr., Tc-Md 101150b (or.tax 7-13-2011)Oregon Tax Court · 2011
  2. Multnomah Cty. Assessor v. Portland Dev. Com., Tc 5008 (or.tax 11-29-2011)Oregon Tax Court · 2011
  3. Portland Dev. Com. v. Multnomah Cty. Ass., Tc-Md 091630d (or.tax 2-28-2011)Oregon Tax Court · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API