Legal Opinion · Dissent

Matter of Birch v. County of Madison

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 18, 2014No. 518726Published

1DissentMcCarthy, J.

I respectfully dissent. We should annul the determination of respondent Board of Supervisors of *1328the County of Madison. “[W]here, as here, there is evidence indicating that the administrative decision maker may have prejudged the matter at issue, disqualification is required” (Matter of Botsford v Bertoni, 112 AD3d 1266, 1269 [2013]). Tina Wayland-Smith, an Assistant County Attorney, testified that she and others met with petitioner, prior to disciplinary charges being proffered, to offer her a separation from employment agreement. Referring to her talking points from that meeting,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. 1616 Second Avenue Restaurant, Inc. v. New York State Liquor AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. Memmelaar v. StraubAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  3. Botsford v. BertoniAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API