Harriss v. . Sneeden
Supreme Court of North Carolina
This was a MOTION to vacate an Order of Arrest, in an action pending in the Superior Court of New HaNOVer County, and heard by Shepherd, J., at Chambers, in January, 1888. The plaintiffs alleged that the feme plaintiff is the owner of the land described in their complaint, and the following is a copy of so much thereof as is material to the questions considered : “ 10. That recently there has been much public discussion as to the probability of a railroad being built to the…
Read the full summary
This was a MOTION to vacate an Order of Arrest, in an action pending in the Superior Court of New HaNOVer County, and heard by Shepherd, J., at Chambers, in January, 1888. The plaintiffs alleged that the feme plaintiff is the owner of the land described in their complaint, and the following is a copy of so much thereof as is material to the questions considered : “ 10. That recently there has been much public discussion as to the probability of a railroad being built to the Island and Beach above mentioned, and as to the increased values of the lands in consequence of such improvements, and…
1Opinion of the Court
Merrimon, J.,
(after stating the case.) In his application in the action for the provisional remedy of arrest and bail, the plaintiff should state in the affidavit such facts as clearly disclose a cause of action as to which the defendant may be arrested as allowed by the statute (The Code, §291). These facts should be set forth with such fullness and legal precision as that the Court can certainly discern the particular cause of action intended to be alleged. It should find the facts from the evidence produced by the plaintiff, and be able to :see and determine that the cause of action exists…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Jones v. . BoydSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1879
- Bear v. . CohenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1871
- State Ex Rel. Peebles v. FooteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1880
- Worthy v. . ShieldsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1884
- Clark v. . ClarkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1870
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Coharie Lumber Co. v. BuhmannSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
- Kelly v. First State Bank of RothsaySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
- Sneeden v. . HarrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1891
- Briggs v. CoykendallNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1929
- Hubbard v. ScottOregon Supreme Court · 1917
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.