Legal Opinion

CHONG v. 7-ELEVEN, INC.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided March 4, 2020No. 2:18-cv-01542Unknown

1Opinion

_ IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ANTHONY CHONG et al., CIVIL ACTION Plaintiffs : v. : 7-ELEVEN, INC., NO. 18-1542 Defendant : ORDER AND NOW, this 4th day of March, 2020, upon consideration of Defendant 7-Eleven’s Motion to Exclude Testimony by Plaintiff's Expert James T. O’Brien and related filings (Doc. Nos. 48-50, 72), Plaintiff MT133132, Inc.’s (“MT”) Response in Opposition (Doc. No. 57), 7- Eleven’s Motion for Summary Judgment and related filings (Doc. Nos. 44-47, 51-53), MT’s Response in Opposition and related filings (Doc. Nos. 58-65, 67,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Jarvis v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
  2. Chatham Communications, Inc. v. General Press Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  3. Fernandez v. LevinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  4. Spang & Co. v. USX Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  5. Gleason v. Norwest Mortgage, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API