Legal Opinion

Franklin v. Eighth Judicial District Court

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided June 19, 1969No. 5883PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Thompson, J.:

In this criminal case the district court granted the defendant’s motion to discover, inspect and copy “the statements of all persons to be called by the prosecution as witnesses at trial.” The pertinent statute does not authorize the discovery of witnesses’ statements, 1 nor does the defendant enjoy a constitutional right to discover them. Mears v. State, 83 Nev. 3, 7, 422 P.2d 230 (1967); Cicenia v. Legay, 357 U.S. 504 (1958); Leland v. Oregon, 343 U.S. 790 (1952). For this reason, the district attorney of Clark County instituted this original proceeding in…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Will v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Leland v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  3. Cicenia v. LagaySupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  4. Mears v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Pinana v. Second Judicial District CourtNevada Supreme Court · 1959

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Cook v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Sturrock v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Clark County Liquor & Gaming Licensing Board v. ClarkNevada Supreme Court · 1986
  4. State v. LewisNevada Supreme Court · 2008
  5. State v. Robles-NievesNevada Supreme Court · 2013

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API