Legal Opinion

McLoughlin v. Brooklyn Heights Railroad

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 15, 1911PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeals by the plaintiffs from judgments of the Supreme Court, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Kings on the 8th day of June, 1911, and from orders entered in said office on the 15th day of June, 1911, denying them motions for a new trial on the minutes.

1Opinion of the Court

Rich, J.:

These appeals are by plaintiffs from a judgment in favor of the defendant in each of the two cases which were tried together. The plaintiffs were passengers on a trolley car operated by the defendant which collided with another of defendant’s cars. The actions are based on the negligence of the defendant in the operation of these ears, and upon the trial the defendant admitted its liability in both eases. The plaintiffs each testified to the injuries received and the attendant consequences; their testimony is corroborated by them physician, and is not contradicted nor are they in any…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Levine v. Brooklyn, Queens County & Suburban RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. McLoughlin v. Brooklyn Heights R.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API