Legal Opinion

Brightmire v. Darnold

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 29, 1954No. 36102PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILLIAMS, Justice.

This action was brought by Paul W. Brightmire, plaintiff, against Hobart Dar-nold, defendant, to recover damages alleged to have been sustained as a result of an automobile collision.

Plaintiff alleged that the collision and resulting damages were caused by the negligence of the defendant. Defendant answered, denying the allegations of plaintiff’s petition and also cross-petitioned for damages allegedly sustained by him. In addition to a general denial, defendant’s answer contained .the following allegation:

“By way of further answer, if needs there be, this defendant says…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bowring v. Denco Bus Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945
  2. Madden v. TillySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  3. Hancock v. ThigpenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bagley Ex Rel. Davis v. Blue Flame Propane Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
  2. Maples v. BryceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API