Legal Opinion
Pardieck v. Pardieck
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided February 7, 1997No. 03A01-9607-CV-219PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NAJAM, Judge.
STATEMENT OP THE CASE
Gregory D. Pardieck (“Gregg”) brings this interlocutory appeal from the trial court’s order which refused to enforce the antenup-tial agreement between him and Julie G. Pardieck (“Julie”). The trial court reasoned that Gregg did not act in good faith during the marriage, having used the antenuptial agreement in an unconscionable fashion to exclude assets from the marital estate. The court concluded that the agreement should be enforced to protect the property Gregg brought into the marriage, but would not be enforced to protect property acquired during…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- First Federal Savings Bank of Indiana v. Key Markets, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1990
- Fowler v. CampbellIndiana Court of Appeals · 1993
- Hamlin v. StewardIndiana Court of Appeals · 1993
- Pigman v. Ameritech Publishing, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1994
- In Re the Marriage of BorenIndiana Supreme Court · 1985
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- BRC Rubber & Plastics, Incorpo v. Continental Carbon CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
- Craig Penn v. Ryan's Family Steak Houses, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
- Scott's S&S Incorporated v. Steak N Shake Enterprises, IncCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
- Vandeventer v. All American Life & Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2003
- Geiger v. Ryan's Family Steak Houses, Inc.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 2001
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.