Legal Opinion

Plymel v. Teachers Retirement System

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided October 30, 2006No. S06A1280PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SEARS, Chief Justice.

The appellants, Larrie Plymel and Corinne Monroe, are retired educators who are beneficiaries of the Teachers Retirement System of Georgia (“TRS”). The appellees are the TRS and its Board of Trustees. This appeal concerns, among other things, whether the TRS properly calculated the appellants’ retirement benefits. The trial court granted summary judgment to the TRS and its Board, and denied partial summary judgment on liability to the appellants. For the reasons that follow, we reverse.

1. Appellant Plymel retired in 2002, and appellant Monroe retired in 1995. At…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Sawnee Electric Membership Corp. v. Georgia Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of Georgia · 2001
  2. Withers v. RegisterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1980
  3. Arneson v. Board of Trustees of Employees' Retirement SystemSupreme Court of Georgia · 1987

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Forsyth County v. WATERSCAPE SERVICES, LLCCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2010
  2. Handel v. PowellSupreme Court of Georgia · 2008
  3. DeKalb County School District v. GoldCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
  4. Mullis v. Bibb CountyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
  5. Teachers Retirement System of Ga. v. PlymelCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2009

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API