Legal Opinion

Chambers v. Smithfield City

Utah Supreme Court

Decided February 14, 1986No. 19252PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HALL, Chief Justice:

Plaintiffs brought this action to invalidate the procedure by which defendant Smithfield City grants variances of its zoning ordinances, and to enjoin the issuance of a building permit to defendant Robert Richardson to build a single family residence upon property for which Richardson was granted a variance.

In 1982, defendant Richardson purchased a .67 acre lot in Smithfield, Utah. Prior to the sale, the lot was part of a one-acre parcel upon which a residence was already built. The lot sold to Richardson is located in a RE-1 zone. The purpose of the RE-1 zone is to serve…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Xanthos v. Bd. of Adjustment of Salt Lake CityUtah Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Thurston v. Cache CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1981

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Cromwell v. WardCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1995
  2. Sandy City v. Salt Lake CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Davis County v. Clearfield CityCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1988
  4. Scherbel v. Salt Lake City Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Wells v. Board of Adjustment of Salt Lake City Corp.Court of Appeals of Utah · 1997

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API