Carter v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
2Per curiam
On consideration of appellee’s petition for rehearing en banc, appellant’s motion for leave to file petition for rehearing, and appellant’s response to appellee’s petition for rehearing en bane and appellant’s petition for rehearing, it is
ORDERED by the merits division * that appellant’s motion for leave to file petition for rehearing is denied; and it appearing that the majority of the judges of this court has voted to grant appellee’s petition for rehearing en banc, it is
FURTHER ORDERED that appellee’s petition for rehearing en banc is granted and that the opinion and judgment of June…
3Cases cited6 opinions
- James v. Earl v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1966
- Stellas v. EsperdySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. Harry v. MohneyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992
- Jaggers v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
- United States v. Herrera-MedinaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by2 opinions
- Carter v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
- Carter v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996