Legal Opinion

Norstrom v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided April 7, 1993No. 89-1966PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

We reconsider this appeal in accordance with the supreme court’s opinion in State v. Norstrom, 613 So.2d 437 (Fla.1993). In doing so, we have reviewed all issues not resolved by our opinion in Norstrom v. State, 587 So.2d 1148 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991).

We find error only as to one sentencing issue. Appellant should not have been convicted of both reckless driving and vehicular homicide. Cf. Carawan v. State, 515 So.2d 161 (Fla.1987), superseded in part by the 1988 amendment to section 775.021(4) of the Florida Statutes; State v. Barritt, 531 So.2d 338 (Fla.1988).

As to all other issues, we affirm.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Carawan v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1987
  2. State v. BarrittSupreme Court of Florida · 1988
  3. State v. NorstromSupreme Court of Florida · 1993
  4. Norstrom v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Stephens v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
  2. Reed v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API