Legal Opinion · Dissent

Clayton v. Clayton

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided March 11, 2011No. 2091045Published

1DissentMoore, Judge

I respectfully dissent.

In the proceedings below, Camden Clayton, the grandson of Estellene Clayton (“Ms. Clayton”), removed the probate proceedings relating to Ms. Clayton’s estate to the Etowah Circuit Court (“the trial court”). Before the removal, it was established that, in her will, Ms. Clayton had named James Clayton, her son and Camden’s father, as the administrator of her estate and that Ms. Clayton had devised certain real property (“the property”) to James and Camden as joint tenants with *656the right of survivorship. Upon removal, Camden requested the trial court to resolve the issue…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Liberty Nat. v. Univ. of Ala. Health Servs.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2003
  2. IP TIMBERLANDS OPERATING CO. LTD. v. DenmissMississippi Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Welsh v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1875
  4. J.S.M. v. P.J.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2004
  5. Mobley v. HarkinsWashington Supreme Court · 1942

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API